<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html</link>
	<description>The random ruminations of Kip Lange, including, but not limited to, pants.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 04:51:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip Lange</title>
		<link>http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html/comment-page-1#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip Lange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Just correcting myself -- above, where I say, highly accomplished &quot;statement&quot;, it should read, &quot;statesman&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just correcting myself &#8212; above, where I say, highly accomplished &#8220;statement&#8221;, it should read, &#8220;statesman&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip Lange</title>
		<link>http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html/comment-page-1#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip Lange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Well, let&#039;s note for the record that you are *certainly* above personal insults. I think anyone reading this can see that very clearly. ;-)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As for &quot;I know CPAC cats&quot;, yes, I have met some, but I do not have any personal friends who have attended CPAC. It&#039;s like saying, &quot;I know Republicans&quot; or &quot;I know steroid users, they always punch fans out in their apartment...&quot; *cough*&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have not yet speculated on who is going to win the general. You are quite right, McCain is a Republican, and Republicans are the status quo. Vote against him if you want to see us pull out of Iraq and watch as the country disintegrates into sectarian violence and all-out civil war. After all, you really care for these people, as a liberal, am I correct? So the best thing to do is erase all our progress and let them kill themselves a la Vietnam. Am I still following you here?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If Obama is the nominee -- and he&#039;s not, yet, he still has to beat the Clinton Machine, and don&#039;t for a second think Clinton has given up in any way, shape, or form -- what he will face in the general as his biggest problem is the experience issue. Two years as a state senator and half a term as in the U.S. senate against a highly accomplished statement.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now, contrary to what you probably believe, the vast majority of the country &lt;i&gt;is conservative&lt;/i&gt;. It&#039;s why Bush won two terms. It&#039;s why the Democrats always rush to the middle in the general after securing their base. Most Americans care about national defense, high taxes, things like that.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Certainly, there is fatigue, though I think history will be kind to Bush -- provided we don&#039;t cut and run in Iraq. A lack of news stories on Iraq, which we&#039;ve definitely seen, means only one thing for the liberal Fourth Estate: there isn&#039;t enough bad news to report. The surge, derided by Obama and Hillary, and championed by McCain -- *worked*.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Although McCain is not *exactly* the status quo, which is why he&#039;s having problems with the conservative base. With nation defense as my one defining issue, I have no problem voting for McCain. However, his remarks regarding justices, with 4-5 spots open on the Supreme Court in the next 4-8 years, rankles many conservatives. So does his stance on immigration (which I don&#039;t care about, I&#039;m soft as hell on immigration).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m not predicting a McCain win. You&#039;re nuts if you think I am. A day in politics is a very long time; a week is a *lifetime*. By next November we could be debating completely different issues. There&#039;s no way to know, and people who know politics know that intuitively.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I will, however, guarantee that if McCain loses and Obama wins, after four years, we will see a &quot;true&quot; conservative emerge on the GOP side, one who will pose a great threat to a second Obama term.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Keep your comments coming. I see you have dealt with the anger issues that I remember superbly, and certainly never attempt to smear anyone.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The status quo isn&#039;t always wrong, you know. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, let&#8217;s note for the record that you are *certainly* above personal insults. I think anyone reading this can see that very clearly. <img src='http://kiplange.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for &#8220;I know CPAC cats&#8221;, yes, I have met some, but I do not have any personal friends who have attended CPAC. It&#8217;s like saying, &#8220;I know Republicans&#8221; or &#8220;I know steroid users, they always punch fans out in their apartment&#8230;&#8221; *cough*</p>
<p>I have not yet speculated on who is going to win the general. You are quite right, McCain is a Republican, and Republicans are the status quo. Vote against him if you want to see us pull out of Iraq and watch as the country disintegrates into sectarian violence and all-out civil war. After all, you really care for these people, as a liberal, am I correct? So the best thing to do is erase all our progress and let them kill themselves a la Vietnam. Am I still following you here?</p>
<p>If Obama is the nominee &#8212; and he&#8217;s not, yet, he still has to beat the Clinton Machine, and don&#8217;t for a second think Clinton has given up in any way, shape, or form &#8212; what he will face in the general as his biggest problem is the experience issue. Two years as a state senator and half a term as in the U.S. senate against a highly accomplished statement.</p>
<p>Now, contrary to what you probably believe, the vast majority of the country <i>is conservative</i>. It&#8217;s why Bush won two terms. It&#8217;s why the Democrats always rush to the middle in the general after securing their base. Most Americans care about national defense, high taxes, things like that.</p>
<p>Certainly, there is fatigue, though I think history will be kind to Bush &#8212; provided we don&#8217;t cut and run in Iraq. A lack of news stories on Iraq, which we&#8217;ve definitely seen, means only one thing for the liberal Fourth Estate: there isn&#8217;t enough bad news to report. The surge, derided by Obama and Hillary, and championed by McCain &#8212; *worked*.</p>
<p>Although McCain is not *exactly* the status quo, which is why he&#8217;s having problems with the conservative base. With nation defense as my one defining issue, I have no problem voting for McCain. However, his remarks regarding justices, with 4-5 spots open on the Supreme Court in the next 4-8 years, rankles many conservatives. So does his stance on immigration (which I don&#8217;t care about, I&#8217;m soft as hell on immigration).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not predicting a McCain win. You&#8217;re nuts if you think I am. A day in politics is a very long time; a week is a *lifetime*. By next November we could be debating completely different issues. There&#8217;s no way to know, and people who know politics know that intuitively.</p>
<p>I will, however, guarantee that if McCain loses and Obama wins, after four years, we will see a &#8220;true&#8221; conservative emerge on the GOP side, one who will pose a great threat to a second Obama term.</p>
<p>Keep your comments coming. I see you have dealt with the anger issues that I remember superbly, and certainly never attempt to smear anyone.</p>
<p>The status quo isn&#8217;t always wrong, you know. <img src='http://kiplange.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html/comment-page-1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I am really hurt by your thoughtful comments which appear to be premised on &quot;base emotion.&quot;  A rabid dog dog foaming at the mouth uses an exclamation point, while a civilized Republican uses personal insults.  Maybe I touched a nerve.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To clear up a few points:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I did not say your poll was representative of the voting public as a whole, but rather who reads your blog.  I think Barack (thanks for the spelling advice by the way; I never would have expected such a nit from someone who has been ranting online for his whole adult life) will win because many people are tired of Bush, the war in Iraq, and are looking for a change in direction.  Barack is gaining momentum and I believe he will be the nominee for the Democrats.  McCain represents the status quo in a lot of ways and I do not think that will resonate well with a majority of the voting public.  Maybe I will be proven wrong, but I think Obama will be our next President.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On the CPAC point, I believe you posted earlier this month: &quot;I know CPAC cats.&quot;  I guess you only name drop when its helpful to your point.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Lastly, you are right on the ass wiping thing.  I can&#039;t wipe my own ass.  My parents help me.  I live in their basement and spend all my time chain smoking, getting drunk and playing video games.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Keep up the good work on the blog.  It is very entertaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really hurt by your thoughtful comments which appear to be premised on &#8220;base emotion.&#8221;  A rabid dog dog foaming at the mouth uses an exclamation point, while a civilized Republican uses personal insults.  Maybe I touched a nerve.</p>
<p>To clear up a few points:</p>
<p>I did not say your poll was representative of the voting public as a whole, but rather who reads your blog.  I think Barack (thanks for the spelling advice by the way; I never would have expected such a nit from someone who has been ranting online for his whole adult life) will win because many people are tired of Bush, the war in Iraq, and are looking for a change in direction.  Barack is gaining momentum and I believe he will be the nominee for the Democrats.  McCain represents the status quo in a lot of ways and I do not think that will resonate well with a majority of the voting public.  Maybe I will be proven wrong, but I think Obama will be our next President.</p>
<p>On the CPAC point, I believe you posted earlier this month: &#8220;I know CPAC cats.&#8221;  I guess you only name drop when its helpful to your point.</p>
<p>Lastly, you are right on the ass wiping thing.  I can&#8217;t wipe my own ass.  My parents help me.  I live in their basement and spend all my time chain smoking, getting drunk and playing video games.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work on the blog.  It is very entertaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip Lange</title>
		<link>http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html/comment-page-1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip Lange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html#comment-112</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re going to call the election based on a tiny poll on my blog?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Dude, how stupid are you? I mean, can you wipe your own ass, or do you need help with that?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And before you go on about someone else misspelling something, you might want to check your own spelling. It&#039;s &quot;Barack&quot;. Not Barrack. Sorry, but you left yourself wide open.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t have any &quot;CPAC buddies&quot;, my friend. And if it&#039;s so obvious Obama is going to win, why are you foaming at the mouth like a rabid dog?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Then again, I forgot, liberals never appeal to reason. They appeal to base emotion and class warfare.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Good luck with that. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re going to call the election based on a tiny poll on my blog?</p>
<p>Dude, how stupid are you? I mean, can you wipe your own ass, or do you need help with that?</p>
<p>And before you go on about someone else misspelling something, you might want to check your own spelling. It&#8217;s &#8220;Barack&#8221;. Not Barrack. Sorry, but you left yourself wide open.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any &#8220;CPAC buddies&#8221;, my friend. And if it&#8217;s so obvious Obama is going to win, why are you foaming at the mouth like a rabid dog?</p>
<p>Then again, I forgot, liberals never appeal to reason. They appeal to base emotion and class warfare.</p>
<p>Good luck with that. <img src='http://kiplange.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html/comment-page-1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiplange.com/2008/02/polls.html#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Where are all your CPAC buddies Mr. Lange?  Maybe they are hunting with Cheney.  Or judging spelling bees with Dan Quayle.  Such a conservative blog and it looks like you are the only one who wants McCain.  One vote for the guy who supports indefinite occupation of foreign countries, 3 for your gal-pal HRC, and 3 for the next President of the United States, Barrack Hussien Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are all your CPAC buddies Mr. Lange?  Maybe they are hunting with Cheney.  Or judging spelling bees with Dan Quayle.  Such a conservative blog and it looks like you are the only one who wants McCain.  One vote for the guy who supports indefinite occupation of foreign countries, 3 for your gal-pal HRC, and 3 for the next President of the United States, Barrack Hussien Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

